Archive for January 8th, 2009

Assessing Impact of Marketing

Assessing the impact of marketing is often a difficult topic for marketers to address. How does one measure the ultimate impact of an advertising campaign for example? How does one assess the impact of speaking engagements at a seminar? What’s the right time frame to be assessing the results? All good questions and there is only one adequate answer: It depends (I know this is a cop out to some extent).

Based on recent experiences and a review of marketing literature throughout my career, some business owners and executives try to oversimplify their answers. For example, while conducting market research for a client that produces a business publication, I asked business owners and marketing managers how they measure the effectiveness of their advertising with the publication. A common response was: “If it works, I’ll keep advertising”. When asked, “how they know if it’s working”, answers typically included “I get an ROI on the dollars, or it leads directly to sales”. Certainly small business owners must tend to their marketing dollars much more closely than a large business, and I’m all for assessing the relative impact of advertising in different media, but one has to be careful not to take an approach that is too narrow and too short term focused.

A past client provided me with a point of view that was refreshing. I was helping his company develop a brand strategy and marketing plan; and also develop essential marketing collateral that included a web site and brochure material.

Prior to my work with them, this B2B company did not have a formal marketing and sales program, collateral was non existant and past efforts were ad hoc . All business was generated through growing client accounts by word of mouth and personal contacts; and periodically introducing new services to existing clients. I asked him how he would determine if the plan would be effective. Here were the highlights of his response at the time:

1) While the roll out of the program began at the start of a calendar year, he felt he’d need to wait until the Fall of that year to assess the impact of the marketing program.

2) He went through a budgeting process with his leadership team that included projections for sales growth. This was a sales target he felt his team could achieve if they operated status quo. If at the end of his fiscal year, the team exceeded that sales target, he would have largely attributed that difference to the marketing of the firm.

3) If there wasn’t a huge sales lift in year 1 of the program, he would not have panicked. He viewed the year as a learning experience will be a year of learning with respect to marketing.

4) He admitted there are many things that need to go right to achieve growth and make a profit. He planned to develop other metrics that can provide indicators his company was doing the right things.

I’d moved on to other client work before seeing the results of this engagement. I circled back with the client two years after the fact. His company had achieved 50% year over year growth over that 24 month span. While I would have liked for him to state the marketing program we developed was the reason for this growth, he stated the real impact of that work was:

1) The marketing efforts created a tremendous amount of credibility for his company. Before the work began, they did not have an image; nor was there company understood in the marketplace (even by their own clients). The brand strategy helped to reinforce positive attributes of their brand that were recognized by clients; the company had developed an elevator pitch that helped clients better understand their business and marketing collateral provided case studies, client lists and complete service lines that helped their existing clients (and new clients) understand the breadth of their services.

2) He described the marketing work as THE catalyst for their sales and marketing efforts. If nothing else, it generated excitement among his team about the prospects of marketing the company and feeling proud about their story.

If only every executive that hired marketing professionals had this kind of outlook? What’s important to note is my client wasn’t suggesting irresponsible marketing and frivolous spending of dollars. He wanted to get the most bang for his marketing dollar. However, he didn’t expect results in 3-months and defined success from a broader point of view for his company.

So what does this all mean? Deriving the answer to the question: “How will I assess the impact of my marketing dollars” is a personal answer and needs to be placed into context. Here are some key elements to consider before developing your answer:

  • Whats’ been my organizations’ past experiences with marketing?
  • What’s the right time frame to measure the impact given my situation?
  • Where is my business at in it’s life cycle?
  • What am I really trying to achieve with marketing?
  • How much risk tolerance do I have with respect to my marketing investment?

There are many other elements to consider when trying to answer this question. But hopefully this helps move the conversation beyond cliche answers like: ROI, response rates, cost/lead.

I hope this this story helps you think differently about measuring the impact of a marketing program.

Add comment January 8th, 2009

Customer Research Invaluable But It’s Just An Input

A past client wanted to develop a brand strategy and also produce its first decent set of collateral material after being in business for over 20 years. I reported directly to the company’s President for this initiative.

I conducted many customer interviews and researched the clients’ competitors to inform the development of the brand strategy.

The management team eventually approved the tag line: “Whatever It Takes”. However, several months later the tag line discussion reemerged during a meeting as were were preparing to produce collateral. The client’s tag line for the three previous years had been, “To Make a Difference”. We developed the new tag line, “Whatever It Takes” to position the company as a team of deeply committed people who were relentless at delivering results: (versus positioning the company based on it technical competencies which was how all its competitors were selling themselves). When executives talked about the company, they often used these exact words to describe how they ensured work was completed to high standards, on time and on budget. The customer interviews also told us the real point of difference for the client was this attitude and deep commitment to customer service.

I felt we had a winning tag line that encapsulated their promise as a company and in three words provided a window into the psyche of this firm.

Much to my dismay, I felt the client was retreating into safe mode by wanting to reuse the same tag line they’d been using for the past three years. The President was shaking his head. Sensing panic, I suggested we run the two tag lines by clients who had previously participated in one-on-one customer research interviews to inform the discussion.

More surprise. Five of sixteen clients responded and here was their feedback:

Client 1: I prefer “To Make a Difference”. It’s classier. Not to be crude, but “Whatever it Takes” just sounds desperate.

Client 2: I think the ” Whatever it Takes ” implies taking short cuts , not following the rules. So I would go with ” To Make a Difference or simply ” Make a Difference ”

Client 3: OK … Neither of them work for me. “whatever it takes” while generally positive; can have several negative connotations; “not in control”, lack of ethics … “to make a difference”, doesn’t engage me at me at all, a slight variation “making a difference” is somewhat better but doesn’t target any specific audience

Client 4: I prefer: “To Make a Difference I think it sounds more professional and better represents what the company’s objectives.

Client 5: To make a difference.

So what to do? Was “Making a Difference” the winner?

I decided to speak to the President about the issue. I let him know about the results, but offered the following reasons as to why I was hesitant about the old tag line:

a) It was off strategy. We spent countless hours developing a brand strategy that determined we were to position the brand based on the company’s ability to service the heck out of their customers.

b) While “Making a Difference” resonated well with current clients , I felt it was an internally focused message that would not resonate well with prospective customers who were unaware of my client’s business.

c) My gut was telling me that “Whatever it Takes” was the right type of message, we had just chosen the wrong words to communicate the company.

We eventually settled on: “Outstanding People - Outstanding Results.” This message resonated better with the team, worked for clients and reinforced the commitment of their organization to meet their clients’ needs. Further discussion with clients suggested this tag line was a strong reflection of the company.

The customer research was invaluable because:

  1. The preliminary market research helped us to understand how the company was perceived by clients and how the company stood out versus competitors.
  2. The follow up interviews with clients was critical to understanding we missed the mark with the first tag line. While a sample of five is not statistically valid, zero for five suggests a trend.

Ultimately, the research helped me make the case to the management team to think differently about their business and pushed them out of the safety zone. Movement was made toward a renewed position that reinforced what the client was truly about.

Add comment January 8th, 2009


Sandor Kiss

Sandor Kiss

Calendar

January 2009
M T W T F S S
    Apr »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Posts by Month

Posts by Category